Driverless Cars: A Driving Force Coming to a Future Near You

Posted by admin on January 20th, 2012

Driverless Car - Concept 18

If you were traveling between Boston and Washington, DC, and had the choice of either flying or riding in a driverless car, which would you choose?

Under good conditions this is an 8.5-hour drive vs. 4-5 hours flying – driving to the airport, wading through security, boarding the flight, landing, and commuting to your destination when you arrive.

Keep in mind that the first wave of driverless vehicles will be luxury vehicles that allow you to kick back, listen to music, have a cup of coffee, stop wherever you need to along the way, stay productive with connections to the Internet, make phone calls, and even watch a movie or two, for roughly the same price.

If you think this vision is far off, think again. Over the next 10 years we will see the first wave of autonomous vehicles hit the roads, with some of the first inroads made with vehicles that deliver packages, groceries, and fast-mail envelopes.

Here are a few thoughts on how this industry will develop.

Read the rest of this entry »

Power to the People: The Great Consumer Backlash

Posted by admin on January 6th, 2012

Power to the People 614

On December 29th, Verizon announced it would begin charging a $2 “convenience fee” for any customers paying monthly bills with a credit or debit card via the Internet or telephone.

Within 24 hours, online petitions began to circulate and commenters voiced their condemnation of Verizon’s corporate greed. Instantly, their messages started showing up on websites and message boards across the Internet, and even the FCC responded quickly, announcing plans to investigate the charge. A day after the so-called convenience fee was announced, Verizon caved to public and governmental pressure and scrapped the charge.

This type of public outcry is beginning to happen with ever-greater frequency.

  • Netflix subscribers derailed the company’s July 2011 plans to raise prices and spin off its DVD-rental business by overwhelming it with more than 27,000 comments. CEO Reed Hastings instantly moved from media darling to media demon over night.
  • In October 2011, Bank of America announced a new $5/month charge to use debit cards. In less than a month, more than 300,000 people signed an online petition to stop the planned fee, and over 21,000 customers pledged to close their Bank of America checking accounts. One news anchor even cut up her card on the air. By the end of Oct, the $5 fee was dropped.

These are just a couple recent examples of how consumers are flexing their newfound muscles. But rest assured, the war against consumer injustice is just beginning. We are witnessing the start of a new era – micro-movements. Here’s what may be happening in the months ahead.

Read the rest of this entry »

Year in Review: Top 10 Articles on FuturistSpeaker.com

Posted by admin on December 31st, 2011

2011 in Review

The sixth law of the future states, “The “unknowability” of the future is what gives us our drive and motivation.”

The fact that the future is unknowable is a good thing. Our involvement in the game of life is based on our notion that we as individuals can make a difference. If we somehow remove the mystery of what results our actions will have, we also dismantle our individual drives and motivations for moving forward.

There is a whole lot that we don’t know about the year ahead. Yes, it will be messy. Important people will die. We will not cure cancer, just yet. And we won’t find a solution for war. But there is great value in the struggle. Our greatest achievements will come from these struggles.

We can learn much about where we’ve come from, and for this reason I’d like to give you a quick overview of the top articles in 2011 on FuturistSpeaker.com, based on popularity. They touch on jobs, education, crime, food supplies, and most importantly, the future. Join me as we take a look at the future through the eyes of the past.

Read the rest of this entry »

Flooring the Customer: Retail 2.0, The Rebirth is Coming

Posted by admin on December 30th, 2011

Future Retail 070

“High expectations are the key to everything” – - Sam Walton

On a recent shopping trip, I went to three separate stores and had difficulty finding what I was looking for. On each of these occasions I talked with a staff person and they told me about an option that either wasn’t apparent to most customers, or that I hadn’t considered.

Yes, the online retail business is stealing a growing percentage of market share, but people-to-people interaction still matters. The problem is that it’s mattering less, and pricing competition is making the people-to-people option a luxury.

Our mobile devices are freeing the retail experience from the confines of the physical storefronts and traditional online locations, allowing shopping to take place virtually anywhere.

In the emerging customer-centric approach to retail, retailers will need to come up with new ways to engage their customers and find ways to lower barriers to purchase. Most importantly, retailers must be prepared to make a sale whenever and wherever a customer is ready. Here are a few thoughts on how they can make that happen.

Read the rest of this entry »

Are Floating Incubators a Precursor to Floating Countries?

Posted by admin on December 9th, 2011

BlueSeed 676

Between 1990 and 2005, immigrants created 25% of all the publicly traded companies in the U.S. These included some of our best-known businesses such as Intel, Sun, eBay, Yahoo, and Google. This same group of foreign nationals went on to become the inventors behind 25% of all patents filed in U.S. in 2006.

Ever since the World Trade Center bombing, the U.S. has been tightening the screws on immigration policy. So much so that securing work visas for the thousands of foreign-born engineers and thinkers that U.S. companies desperately need for them to conduct business has become a serious impediment. Many fledgling companies simply can’t afford the effort.

Problems like this are screaming for a solution and a new startup called Blueseed, founded by Max Marty and Dario Mutabdzija, may have a solution.

Blueseed, now funded by PayPal founder Peter Thiel, proposes to create visa-free floating work villages in international waters, with the first to be located within helicopter distance of Silicon Valley.

So will this ingenious plan to circumvent U.S. immigration policy lead to more policy tampering and eventually an erosion of the power of nations? Here are a few possible scenarios that are sure to surprise you.

Read the rest of this entry »

Introducing: Eight Grand Challenges for Humanity

Posted by admin on July 15th, 2011

Eight Grand Challenges
.
On Sunday I gave the closing keynote at the World Future Society’s “WorldFuture 2011″ event in Vancouver, BC. It was an energized crowd of inspired thinkers from around the globe, and I felt quite honored to be part of this event.

As I took the stage, my goal was to introduce the crowd to a series of Eight Grand Challenges, incentivized competitions designed to push humanity to another level.

But as with many crowds, there was a formidable issue in the minds of attendees, a hurdle of acceptance before these challenges would be deemed cause-worthy.

At issue was our obsession with solving all of today’s problems before we dare think about advancing humanity. How can we possibly justify advancing humanity when the money would be far better spent solving today’s massive problems?

Answering this objection first, was critically important, so here is the way I presented it.

If we only focus on solving today’s problems, we become trapped in the past. Every solution leads to another set of problems. Much like the whack-a-mole game at video arcades, as one problem gets pounded down, another pokes its ugly head out.

The only real way out is to advance civilization. By advancing civilization we change the nature of the problems we’re dealing with, and that is exactly what the Eight Grand Challenges have been designed to do.

Read the rest of this entry »

Global System Architects – Tomorrow’s New Power Brokers

Posted by admin on June 24th, 2011
Global System Architects – Emerging New Power Brokers
I often describe the future with human-like characteristics. By doing so, it helps me think through our relationship with the future in novel ways. So here is an example of this:
The future hates complacency. It hates complacency so much so that it has built-in self-sabotaging mechanisms to continually hold our feet to the fire. It will not allow us to shift into neutral. If we are not moving forward, we are moving backwards. There is no middle ground.
People are at their best when they are challenged. If we don’t challenge ourselves, the future has a way of giving us challenges anyway. There is great value in our struggles and human nature has shown us that we only tend to value the things we struggle to achieve.
We are currently out of balance between backward-looking problem-solving and forward-looking accomplishments. Forward accomplishments help erase past problems. They solve problems in a different way. We need more forward-looking accomplishments, and our greatest undertakings in the future will come in this area.
Yes, I understand this sounds a bit abstract, but bear with me.
Our need for future accomplishments will also create a need for better systems to regulate, manage, and leverage the activities surrounding them. These systems will need to be global in nature, and over time, a few will emerge to challenge the power of nations. That time is coming very soon.
From National Systems to Global Systems
The ringing of the bell marks the opening and closing of each day on the New York Stock Exchange.  For decades this symbolic beginning and ending of the workday has set the pace for business in the US.  For decades, work only seemed to mattered when the money people were watching.
However, that all changed once the Internet gave day-traders the ability to manage accounts around the world on the Tokyo, Honk Kong, Indian, Athens, and London stock exchanges. Start and stop times suddenly became blurred, and eventually went away.  The metronome of business began to pulse to a different beat, and the once distinct start and stop times of Wall Street ended, it created never-ending business routines framed around a non-stop marathon of opportunities.
This ever quickening pace of business has given strategists a whole new playbook, which has, in turn, forced companies to devise new systems and strategies to not only give them a competitive edge, but in the process, trump the competition.
Government, on the other hand, has virtually no competition, and consequentially, little motivation to innovate.  Like a lumbering elephant alongside the sleek cat-like speed of business, government has done little to keep pace with change, and even less to experiment, innovate, and improve.
Our governmental systems are evolving at speeds that are exponentially slower than the
businesses that use them.
People in government are synchronized to a radically different clock. They are neither driven to compete nor incentivized to reinvent themselves.  With their change-resistant inertia firmly anchored in the past, internal government systems have grown increasingly dysfunctional, sparking a growing voice of discontent among business veterans.  Deteriorating education, increasingly expensive healthcare, a legal system with an unfathomable number of laws, seemingly corrupt financial institutions, incomprehensible tax codes, and an adversarial attitude toward change have all paved the way for a new breed of governing entities to emerge.
FedEx as a Global System
The original idea for FedEx came when Fred Smith wrote a term paper as an undergraduate at Yale about a very simple observation: As society automated, as people began to put computers in banks to cancel checks, and people began to put sophisticated electronics in airplanes, the corporate world was going to need a completely different logistics system.
Fred was working as a charter pilot at the Tweed New Haven Airport flying to various airports in the New England states talking to pilots who worked for many of the high-tech companies like IBM and Xerox and found out what a difficult proposition it was to keep their field-service engineers and their parts and logistics systems operating. Many of the corporate airplanes had to be repurposed to fly computer and machine parts around whenever something broke down.
Several years later, after a stint in the Marines, Fred revisited the problem and found out that things had become significantly worse.
Emery Air Freight was trying to solve the exact same problem, but was trying to use an infrastructure built around passenger planes, which weren’t designed to handle freight. So they were force-fitting the rapid movement of high-value-added and high-technology products into a transportation system that wasn’t designed for it.
So FedEx was proposed as a customized system to solve this problem. To do this they had to have a nationwide clearinghouse – an integrated system with trucks and planes to give the level of service that customers needed.
For their network, they used the Federal Reserve Bank clearing house system, where all payments converge on a central location to complete the transaction, as their model.  And that’s where the Federal Express name came from. Fred wanted something that sounded substantial and nationwide, and American Express had already been taken.
It was all made possible when the government began to deregulate the airline industry. Prior to that time, both surface and air transportation was erroneously based on linear routes, with complicated systems for making connections.
It all came together during 1977-78 when the airlines were deregulated. A couple years later in 1980, the US federal government deregulated interstate transportation. Because the Postal Service had a monopoly on delivering mail, document delivery wasn’t allowed from a legal standpoint until 1978. The standards changed in 1978 as to what constituted an item that was covered by the postal monopoly. Merrill Lynche and a few others waged an ongoing assault through lobbyists and the press saying, telling Congress that the USPS service was not acceptable.  At the time, Merrill was being hamstrung in its efforts to move bond “Blue Books” and other types of financial prospectuses.
Bowing under the pressure, congress exempted certain types of publications and documents from the postal monopoly in legislation called the Private Express Statutes. As long as a company was delivering something overnight, and charged twice as much as the First Class postage stamps, then it was exempt from the Postal monopoly. So that defined the business FedEx went into.
Backed with venture capital funding amounting to $91 million, along with another $4 million that Fred Smith had personally received as an inheritance, FedEx started out with 14 planes, initially flying between 25 cities.
In 1985 FedEx began regularly scheduled flights to Europe, adding service to Japan in 1988, the Middle East in 1989, and the rest of the world in 1991.
In just 18 years FedEx had become a global delivery system, not unlike many of our other global systems, most of which took centuries to develop.
Eight Current Global Systems
Global systems are a fascinating area of study because they provide a context so few ever consider.
When we look at early systems such as written communications with Phoenician cuneiform, Mayan numerals, or the systems that had to be in place for engineering and building the Egyptian pyramids, it’s easy to see that system thinking has been around a long time.  But global systems are a more recent innovation.
The most obvious advantage to global systems are the efficiencies they create.  As an example, when a person who has spent their life hunting and fishing for food is able to walk to a store and purchase food, they suddenly have far more time in their life to do other things.
Similarly, when a company who has had to make painful arrangements for the delivery of goods from the other side of the world can begin working with FedEx who provides painless global delivery, the company suddenly has time to focus on other critical problems.
Here are eight examples of global systems and their development:
1. Global Trade – In 1264 when Marco Polo traveled the fabled “Silk Road” from Europe to what is now Beijing, China, he made some of the first inroads into creating a system for global trade.
2. Global Sea Transportation – On the evening of August 3, 1492, Columbus set sail under the Spanish flag from Palos, Spain with three ships on his journey to America.  This historic journey triggered an age of exploration, but more importantly gave rise to a new era of global sea transportation system.
3. Global Measurement System – In his 1670 book, the Observationes diametrorum solis et lunae apparentium, French scientist Gabriel Mouton proposed the basis for what would later become the metric system.  Mouton described a decimal system of measurement based on the circumference of the Earth, creating a global measurement system recognized (although not fully adopted) by countries around the world.
4. Global News Service – While the telegraph was still in the early stages of development, in 1848 Paul Reuter founded the Reuters News Agency using carrier pigeons to provide the missing link between Berlin and Paris. The carrier pigeons were much faster than the post train, giving Reuter faster access to stock news from the Paris stock exchange. In 1851, the carrier pigeons were retired with the installation of a direct telegraph line. Paul Reuter played a critical role in the development of today’s global news services.
5. Global Time Zones – In October 1884, at the request of U.S. President Chester A. Arthur, the International Meridian Conference was held in Washington, D.C. to form the basis for times and time zones around the world. Twenty-five countries were represented by 41 delegates to establish what has become today’s global time zone system.
6. Global Air Transportation – Charles Lindbergh, better known as “Lucky Lindy,” became famous for completing the first solo, non-stop flight across the Atlantic, from Roosevelt Field, Long Island, to Paris in 1927 in the “Spirit of St. Louis.” This single act ushered in the age of global air transportation.
7. Global Navigation System – Launched in 1978, the GPS system serves as a Global Navigation Satellite System utilizing a constellation of 24 medium Earth orbit satellites that transmit precise microwave signals enabling a GPS receiver to determine its location, speed and direction.
8. The Internet – In 1989 Tim Berners-Lee developed the Internet protocols that would become the World Wide Web, as a hypermedia initiative for global information sharing while at CERN, the European Particle Physics Laboratory in Switzerland. He wrote the first web client and server in 1990. His specifications of URIs, HTTP and HTML were refined as Web technology spread.
While these are just a sampling of the global systems that now exist, many more are on their way.  In fact, the Internet has become the perfect platform for global systems to be designed, tested, and flourish.
Eight Emerging Global Systems
Here are some examples of global systems that are currently emerging online.  I think it is safe to say that none of these were started with the intention of becoming “global systems,” but in the DNA of their business structures, they now exist as global systems in the making.
1. Global Search – Google, Yahoo, Baidu
2. Global Encyclopedia – Wikipedia
3. Global Atlas – Google Earth, Google Maps, Mapquest
4. Global Social Networking – Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Hi5
5. Global Video Archive – YouTube, Vimeo, MetaCafe
6. Global 3-D Virtual World – Second Life, World of Warcraft, Club Penguin
7. Global Marketplace – eBay, Amazon, Craig’s List, Buy.com
8. Global Music Store – iTunes, last.fm, Amazon
Pay close attention to the nature of this list.  We have just made the transition from top-down organizational structures to bottom-up organic systems that are participant driven and constantly evolving.
The driving force behind developing new global systems is that each one represents a multi-billion dollar opportunity.  Yes, in addition to making life easier, they make great economic sense.
The next wave of global systems, however, will not be run by corporations, but rather by a new breed of what I call Experimental Nation States, governmental-like entities that experiment with new ways for managing the world.
Eight Future Global Systems
Future global systems will emerge from today’s existing industry associations. Many already have members living in multiple countries, and many seek to balance their decision-making councils with representation from each member country.
Here are eight possible future global systems:
1. Global accounting standards for publicly traded companies
2. Global currency
3. Global airport authority to manage airport standards and policies around the world
4. Global oceans authority for managing everything that happens in international waters
5. Global genealogy system and standards
6. Global ownership authority to govern standards and regulations, for personal ownership rights
7. Global ethics standards
8. Global patent system
Many of these organizations already exist on some level. But over time, the organizations that manage global systems will grow in influence and authority and begin to usurp the power of nations.
As an example, WIPO, the World Intellectual Property Organization is responsible for bridging the chasm between existing intellectual property laws that exist in nations around the world. Even with WIPO in place there are huge problems with competing rules, laws, and standards in the world of patents, trademarks, and copyrights.
If we start with the vision that sometime in the future, a person will be able to file a patent and it will be universally recognized and honored around the world, the natural question becomes, who will that organization be and what will it take for them to achieve that level of clout and authority?
By its very nature, any global system aspiring for power will become a threat to existing national organizations. The evolution of global systems will involve countless hard fought battles against their current member base. Even though the need for global systems will be billed as a solution for the bias, fraud, and self interest of nations and the corporate interests they represent, it will be more complicated than that.
In some cases, the corruption and self-interest inside the leadership of global system councils will be greater than the corruption inside the counties they represent. This is simply the nature of this type of authority.
Defining moments will occur when the global organizations begin to challenge the authority of their national counterparts. In some cases the organizations will be set up as e-democracies with members voting on every key issue.
Global System Architects – Tomorrow’s Great Power Brokers
One hundred years from now, what will be the most powerful entities in the world?
Will corporate CEO’s have more power and control than leaders of individual countries? Will religious organizations, wielding their international clout, begin to usurp the authority of their host nations? Will groupings of countries such as the European Union, OPEC, and the UN supersede the power of their member states? Will non-governmental organizations such as the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, and perhaps even ICANN rise in influence to a point where they can usurp the authority of individual countries? Will the economic ties of large professional organizations, such as IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers – currently with 365,000 members worldwide), transcend the authority of the countries where their members live?
In the past, the power of a nation was considered the ability to defeat an enemy and protect its own people. But power today is more about the ability to influence and control others, even though a few still cling to the notion that it’s about defeating the enemy.
In the future, a few dominant countries will continue to serve as the global police to quash uprisings and resolve disputes. But as communication systems improve, we will see fewer and fewer willing to openly wage war with an enemy.
Most of the power shifts between now and 2050 will result from subversive economic battles, and the ability to control or disrupt revenue streams. For the disruptors, the tools for creating chaos are becoming more destructive, and soon a single individual with the right kind of gear will be able to shut down, perhaps even destroy, an entire nation.
The power centers of the future will be the countries with systems most adept at competing in the global marketplace. Large countries like China, Russia, Brazil, India, Japan, England, and USA will still play major roles, but smaller countries will have a distinct advantage with their ability to quickly adapt and experiment with new approaches.
By Futurist Thomas Frey

Global System Architects 771

I often describe the future with human-like characteristics. By doing so, it helps me think through our relationship with the future in novel ways. So here is an example of this:

The future hates complacency. It hates complacency so much so that it has built-in self-sabotaging mechanisms to continually hold our feet to the fire. It will not allow us to shift into neutral. If we are not moving forward, we are moving backwards. There is no middle ground.

People are at their best when they are challenged. If we don’t challenge ourselves, the future has a way of giving us challenges anyway. There is great value in our struggles and human nature has shown us that we only tend to value the things we struggle to achieve.

We are currently out of balance between backward-looking problem-solving and forward-looking accomplishments. Forward accomplishments help erase past problems. They solve problems in a different way. We need more forward-looking accomplishments, and our greatest undertakings in the future will come in this area.

Yes, I understand this sounds a bit abstract, but bear with me.

Our need for future accomplishments will also create a need for better systems to regulate, manage, and leverage the activities surrounding them. These systems will need to be global in nature, and over time, a few will emerge to challenge the power of nations. That time is coming very soon.

Read the rest of this entry »

The Rise of the Cause-Architect

Posted by admin on June 10th, 2011
The Rise of the Cause-Architect
In 1862, Abraham Lincoln signed into law the famous Emancipation Proclamation, a piece of legislation that gave freedom to all of the slaves. But true freedom was still a century away for those who lived in the black vs. white world leading up to the Civil Rights movement, an effort that began in earnest in the 1950s.
The movement for freeing the slaves was a social cause that tore the country apart, resulting in a civil war and a century’s worth of social scarring that needed to heal before the effort could begin again.
In 1954 the stage was set with a Supreme Court ruling that made segregation illegal. After years of marches, protests, and demonstrations, the Civil Rights movement peaked in 1963 with Martin Luther King’s famous “I Have a Dream” speech, in front of the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, DC. After a few more tumultuous years of social unrest involving the assassinations of President Kennedy, Bobby Kennedy, and Martin Luther King the movement came to an end in 1968 with the passage of several pieces of legislation aimed at outlawing racial discrimination.
In the past, movements like this were filled with tension and riddled with conflict. But that is quickly changing.
Every cause has a beginning, middle, and an end. When deep-seated differences are involved, tensions will rise and fighting will occur. But for most movements, where the stakes are less divisive, society simply adjusts and moves on.
In the fluid society we find ourselves in today, with massive communication systems for organizing and influencing public opinion, social causes are far easier to orchestrate. And this ease with which we can manage a movement is giving rise to a new breed of influencer – the cause architect.
As our ability to communicate, influence, and organize increases, the likelihood of violence decreases. This also means the life-cycle of most causes today will be far shorter than those of the past. More things happen quicker.
It has also turned the “cause architect,” the key person serving as the movement’s organizer and inspirational leader, into a respected position.
Once we begin to understand the life-cycle of a cause, and the stages of activity that take place at the beginning, middle, and end, leaders can begin to manage far more organized efforts than ever in the past.
Stage One – Launching a New Cause
Whenever there are polarizing differences between two groups of people, there is an opening for a new cause to emerge. In the past, the launching points stemmed from things like poverty and wealth gaps. Today it may be caused by differences in customs, immigration standards, ethics, and values.
However, those ingredients alone do not constitute a movement.
Movements begin with a single event that triggers a significant reaction, something I call a fuse-lighting event. This particular event will begin a chain reaction of other events leading to the creation of a stage-one social movement. For example, the Civil Rights movement grew from the reaction to Rosa Parks, a black woman, riding in the whites-only section of a bus.
Similarly, the Polish Solidarity movement, which eventually toppled the communist regimes of Eastern Europe, resulted from trade union activist Anna Walentynowicz being fired from work.
In one we know far less about in the U.S., the South African shack dwellers’ movement began because a road blockade was set up in response to the sudden selling off of a small piece of land promised for housing to a developer.
Typically, social movements are created around some charismatic leader with the right combination of skills to both engineer and execute a strategy, and organize and manage a following.
After the social movement sees its first sparks of activity, there are two likely phases of recruitment. The first phase will gather the people deeply interested in the primary goal and ideal of the movement. The second wave of recruits will usually come after the movement has had some success and becomes trendy. The later recruits typically don’t stick around very long.
Stage Two – Defining Success
Many movements fall apart because they are not focused around any kind of success strategy. If there is an implicit demand for change, there needs to be a clear description of what that change will look like.
The most successful movements will develop a series of benchmarks to help measure progress along the way. And they will not succeed if the whole effort is simply oriented around a need.
Needs are ongoing but causes have a definable life cycle with an actual endpoint. More important than the endpoint, definable life cycles have definable criteria for success. Success criteria creates the foundational underpinnings of good management metrics.
Tomorrow’s tools will allow us to micro-analyze virtually any situation and find the primary inflection points where a change can be most effective, and good metrics can be put into place. If the metrics are measurable, progress can be tracked.
In the past, people with a big heart, who dedicate their lives to helping the needy, were held in high esteem. It was a virtuous life filled with personal fulfillment. In the future, an even greater virtue will be bestowed upon those who are capable of solving the predicaments that create the needy class in the first place. Cause architects will extend their work far beyond working with the disadvantaged, and set out to wrestle social injustice to the ground. Cause architecture will become an exciting new profession well suited for inspired young people who both want to make a name for themselves and live a life of meaning.
Stage Three – Finding the End
Virtually every piece of music has a beginning, middle, and end. Much like telling a good story, books and television scripts also have a discernable beginning, middle, and end.
The best cause architects will be the ones who continually work themselves out of a job. Their role will be to construct a realistic action plan, execute, and complete the process of solving major social problems.
Future cause architects will come armed with tools unimaginable by today’s standards, as well as tools they invent along the way.
However, the most important element in the whole equation comes with knowing when it’s over. Asking for too much is as bad as asking for too little. A good cause architect will know when they’ve reached the point of diminishing returns.
Final thoughts…
Causes represent a natural system for checks and balances. Done correctly they can be a very effective tools for righting social wrongs and correcting the excesses of government and the political system.
The reason why movements are not used more often is because they’re messy. In a social setting with lots of moving parts, it’s very challenging to find the right way to puzzle everything together and make something significant happen.
But that’s about to change.
With the right tools, a cause architect can be very effective in bringing about change quickly. People with money will find a change-agent with a plan very attractive.
Philanthropists aspire to a higher calling. They don’t want to just fund the needy, they want to change the outcome of the poor. And they are far more likely to funnel money through someone who understands what success looks like.
By Futurist Thomas Frey

Cause Architect 764

In 1863, Abraham Lincoln signed into law the famous Emancipation Proclamation, an executive order that granted some freedom to slaves. But true freedom was still a century away for those who lived in the black vs. white world leading up to the Civil Rights movement, an effort that began in earnest in the 1950s.

The movement for freeing the slaves was a social cause that tore the country apart, resulting in a civil war and a century’s worth of social scarring that needed to heal before the effort could begin again.

In 1954 the stage was set with a Supreme Court ruling that made school segregation illegal. After years of marches, protests, and demonstrations, the Civil Rights movement peaked in 1963 with Martin Luther King’s famous “I Have a Dream” speech, in front of the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, DC. After a few more tumultuous years of social unrest involving the assassinations of President Kennedy, Bobby Kennedy, and Martin Luther King the movement came to an end in 1968 with the passage of several pieces of legislation aimed at outlawing racial discrimination.

In the past, movements like this were filled with tension and riddled with conflict. But that is quickly changing.

Every cause has a beginning, middle, and end. When deep-seated differences are involved, tensions will rise and fighting will occur. But for most movements, where the stakes are less divisive, society simply adjusts and moves on.

In the fluid society we find ourselves in today, with massive communication systems for organizing and influencing public opinion, social causes are far easier to orchestrate. And this ease with which we can manage a movement is giving rise to a new breed of influencer – the cause-architect.

Read the rest of this entry »

Inventing the Rocking Chair Tree

Posted by admin on May 27th, 2011
Inventing the Rocking Chair Tree
On Tuesday evening we had a packed audience at the DaVinci Institute to discuss the future of micro farming. Admittedly, we weren’t terribly well organized and the range of topics we touched on were far more than most of us could reasonably consider in a single setting. But for those who took part in the discussion groups, some amazing ideas came to light.
Our goal for the evening was to build a community of interest, and judging from the responses afterwards, we have all the makings of a very vibrant community coming together.
The next step will be to push the envelope of thinking and begin creating visions of the future that will influence others around the world.
As part of our effort to help people think more creatively, I mentioned the idea of tree-jacking where we will someday be able to jack into trees and more directly influence their growth patterns. One example I gave was the rocking char tree.
“Wouldn’t it be cool if we could cause a tree to grow so all of the branched grew into perfectly shaped rocking chairs? So come harvest time, we just climb up and cut down all the rocking chairs?”
Plant Intelligence
So how smart are plants?  And, can we make them smarter?
Plants like the Venus Flytrap demonstrate a small amount of intelligence when they attract a fly into their sticky trap and close their mouth around it.
In a somewhat similar display of plant intelligence, Poison Ivy plants are able to sense danger through the proximity of a person or animal, and as a defense mechanism, the plant will shoot out a poisonous spay.
But are plants trainable?  Can we implant shapes or design specs into a plant and have them grow into that shape?
As I mentioned above, will it be possible to “train” a tree to have its branches grow into the shape of end tables, coffee tables, chairs, or rocking chairs.  So once the branches are fully grown, we can walk up to the tree and harvest the rocking chairs by cutting them down.  This will be similar to harvesting apples or cherries.
If you think that sounds crazy, a Chinese man has already patented a technique for growing his own wooden chairs.  In an article published in the China Morning Business View, the inventor, Mr. Wu, from Liaoning City, Shengyang province, moulds branches into shape while the tree is still growing.
He uses elm trees which are pliant and do not break easily.  Mr. Wu, who’s in his 60s, says it takes him about five years to grow a tree chair, from saplings to the finished article. As the ‘chair’ grows, he constantly trims and guides it into shape before the chair is finally harvested.
It was reported that Mr. Wu has one tree chair in his home, which he harvested in September 2006, and six more growing in his field. He hopes that one day people will be able to grow all of their furniture instead of having to buy it from a store.
While still a confusing technology in its Neanderthal stages of development, it becomes an important piece of building the visions of what’s possible.
Will we someday be able to “grow” our own clothing, clothing that is intelligent, self-repairing, able to change colors to match our mood, and protective in extreme elements? Can this “grown” clothing be physically enhancing, capable of making us stronger, faster, able to stop bullets, but also capable of keeping our weight down and at the same time keeping out body trim and fit?
If these ideas seem a bit too extreme, rest assured they are only scratching the surface.
World’s Most Dangerous Animals
After doing some research, I’ve assembled a list of the top eight animals that pose the greatest threat to humankind.  These numbers are global estimates of the human casualty count associated with each of these creatures.
1.) Mosquito – An estimated 2-3 million fatalities a year
2.) Venomous Snakes – An estimated 50,000-125,000 fatalities a year
3.) Deer – An estimated 2,000-4,000 fatalities a year.
4.) Scorpions – An estimated 800-2,000 fatalities a year.
5.) Big Cats (Lions, Tigers, Leopards, etc) – An estimated 800 fatalities a year.
6.) Crocodiles – An estimated 600-800 fatalities a year.
7.) Bees – An estimated 400-600 fatalities a year.
8.) Elephants – An estimated 300-500 fatalities a year.
For those of you who think in groups of 10, you can add hippos with estimated 100-150 fatalities a year and that most over-rated of evil sea creatures, the shark, with somewhere around 100 fatalities a year.
The reason I find this to be such an intriguing list is because of the animal in the number 3 slot, that vicious creature we’ve learned to love and hate, the deer.
On a recent trip to South Dakota my wife and I had the misfortune of colliding with a deer late one evening.  While I had just enough time to stomp on my brakes and wear a flat side onto my tires, it wasn’t quite enough time to avoid the deer that appeared out of nowhere in the darkness.  The deer apparently had no way of intellectually connecting the engine noise, screeching tires, and blazing headlights with the coming danger.
The U.S. Department of Transportation estimates that the white-tailed deer alone kills around 130 Americans each year simply by causing car accidents. In 1994, the “predator” deer had a banner year, causing 211 human deaths in car wrecks.
In the U.S. there are about 1.5 million deer/vehicle collisions annually, resulting in 29,000 human injuries and more than $1 billion in insurance claims in addition to the death toll.  Approx 50% of all the accidents happen in Oct, Nov, and Dec during mating season.
Deer also carry the ticks that transmit Lyme disease to about 13,000 people each year. Economic damage to agriculture, timber, and landscaping by deer totals more than $1.2 billion a year.
Yes, one of the world’s most dangerous animals in the world is the lowly deer.  This is one of those facts that if told to people living in the 1800’s, they would have found it quite amusing.
But it also points to the fact that, up until this point, deer are an animal that is not capable of learning.  Evolutionary theory would lead us to believe that given the confrontational nature of deer and cars, that some amount of learning should have been passed down from one generation to the next.
Indeed there is empirical evidence of this being true with birds, where the number of dead birds found stuck in the grills of cars has dropped dramatically over the past few decades.  But the same is not true for deer.
So the question becomes – are deer incapable of learning, or have we simply not found the proper systems or techniques for training them?
Speculating on this notion, if we were able to increase the intelligence of deer just slightly, then logically they would become aware of the dangers of running in front of cars.  Nearly all other animal species have learned to avoid cars, so it seems reasonable that deer must simply be missing something.
In fact, if we push this line of thinking to the comical extreme and we increase deer intelligence a few steps beyond collision avoidance, the deer-crossing signs found many places along roads could be rotated 90 degrees and changed from “deer-crossing” signs to “car-crossing” signs for the deer to read.
Perhaps this comes across as little more than an amusing idea, but it brings us to a much larger topic to consider – animal intelligence.
Animal Intelligence
Are animals capable of learning?
Many animals have special cognitive abilities that allow them to excel in their particular habitats, but they do not often solve novel problems. Some of course do, and we call them intelligent, but none are as quick-witted as humans.
In the 1970s, Herbert Terrace, a psychologist at Columbia University, trained a chimp named Nim Chimpsky to recognize 125 different sign language gestures and use these signs to communicate on an elementary level.  Circus trained animals such as horses, elephants, and tigers have learned to respond to human voice commands.  In fact most dogs are able to display a high degree of perception from being immersed in the communication of their owners.
But is it possible to raise this existing level of intelligence even further?
As an example, if we were able to raise the intelligence of a silk worm, could a silk worm be trained to automatically “weave a tie” or “create a shirt”?
To make this a more plausible, would it be possible to create a material frame that a silk worm could navigate around, effectively creating a shirt that could later be “harvested”, dyed, and packaged for sale?
Swallows are the pesky birds that create the dirty mud nests on the sides of buildings.  With a little training, would it be possible to teach the swallows to work with cement instead of mud, and use cement to build foundations for buildings instead of their mud nests.  Perhaps they could even be trained to build monuments or towers.
Think that sounds a little too farfetched?  Well, here is another variable to consider.
Growing Rocks
The idea of growing a rock sounds equally far-fetched at first glance, but there are many instances of rocks and rock-like material being grown in nature.
One obvious example is crystals.  The process of forming a crystalline structure is often referred to as crystallization. When heating liquids, the cooling process often results in the generation of crystalline material.
Crystalline structures occur in many classes of materials, with numerous types of chemical bonds. Almost all metal exists in a polycrystalline state; amorphous or single-crystal metals must be produced synthetically, often with great difficulty. Ionically bonded crystals can form upon solidification of salts, either from a molten fluid or when it condenses from a solution.
Covalently bonded crystals are also very common, with notable examples being diamond, silica, and graphite. Polymer materials generally will form crystalline regions, but the length of the molecules usually prevents complete crystallization. Weak Van der Waals forces can also play a role in a crystal structure; for example, this type of bonding loosely holds together the hexagonal-patterned sheets in graphite.
Another example of growing rock-like material is found in ocean coral.
Corals are marine animals that exist as small polyps, typically in colonies of many identical individuals. The coral group includes reef builders that are found in tropical oceans, which secrete calcium carbonate to form a hard skeleton.
A coral “head”, commonly perceived to be a single organism, is actually formed of thousands of individual but genetically identical polyps, each polyp is only a few millimeters in diameter. Over thousands of generations, the polyps lay down a skeleton that is characteristic of their species. A head of coral grows by asexual reproduction of the individual polyps.
Using what may be considered a more abstract view of nature, some view the earth itself as capable of “growing” its own rocks and mountains.  When volcanoes spew forth their rivers of molten lava, we are able to witness the creation of new rocks.  The key question is not “can it be controlled?” but rather “when will we be able to control it?”
Where do we go from here?
Placing boundaries around our thinking can have both positive and negative effects. On one hand, a boundary can keep us focused and more productive. At the same time, it will prevent us from seeing the logical next step.
While it’s easy for me to blur the lines between plants and animals and between organic and inorganic material, it may not be terribly useful to go down that path.
As the micro agronomy group meets over the coming months, we will begin to settle in on common visions and common goals.
It will be a fascinating process to watch, and I feel quite honored to be part of it.
By Futurist Thomas Frey

wood-rocking-chairs-tree 2

On Tuesday evening we had a packed audience at the DaVinci Institute to discuss the future of micro farming. Admittedly, we weren’t terribly well organized and the range of topics we touched on were far more than most of us could reasonably consider in a single setting. But for those who took part in the discussion groups, some amazing ideas came to light.

Our primary goal was to build a community of interest, and judging from the responses afterwards, we have all the makings of a very vibrant community coming together.

The next step will be to push the envelope of thinking and begin creating visions of the future that will influence others around the world.

As part of our effort to help people think more creatively, I mentioned the idea of tree-jacking where we will someday be able to jack into trees and more directly influence their growth patterns. One example I gave was the rocking char tree.

“Wouldn’t it be cool if we could cause a tree to grow so all of the branched grew into perfectly shaped rocking chairs? So, come harvest time, we just climb up the tree and cut down all the rocking chairs?”

Read the rest of this entry »

TEDxUChicago 2011 – Communicating with the Future

Posted by admin on May 17th, 2011
YouTube Preview Image
Futurist Thomas Frey at the TEDx University of Chicago event
We are a very backward looking society.We’re very backward looking in that we’ve all personally experienced the past.  As we look around, we see evidence of the past all around us.   The past is very knowable, yet we will spend the rest of our lives in the future.My job as a futurist is to help turn people around and give them some idea of what the future holds.So, what images come to mind when you think about the future?If you are like most people, you have some persistent vision of the future that keeps replaying in your head. Perhaps it’s an image of riding on a hoverboard, traveling in a flying car, or stopping at a space hotel.Many of these visions have been planted in your head through the movies you watch or the magazines and books that you read.More importantly than how they were created is the question, “Who owns these visions?”I’m not talking about the intellectual property rights associated with these images. Rather, who is it that cares enough about these particular visions to want to take an ownership stake in their creation and fruition?In the vast majority of all cases, the answer is simply, “no one.”In the years ahead, the speed of business will continue to accelerate, and executive teams will quickly learn that simply planning for the future is no longer good enough. In order for them to better control their own destiny, they will need to take an ownership stake in the creation of the future, and that’s why this book is so important.Until now, the science of the future has been a murky science. The tools are primitive, reputations are often suspect, and the unknowns continue to dominate the path ahead.Scenario planning, trend analysis, demographic shifts, and cyclical patterns are all tiny Braille bumps on the looming mosaic that constitutes our future, and some of our best and brightest continue to be confounded when it comes to predicting the future.But what if we step beyond simply predicting the future and instead work on controlling it?
We are a very backward looking society.
We’re very backward looking in that we’ve all personally experienced the past.  As we look around, we see evidence of the past all around us.   The past is very knowable, yet we will spend the rest of our lives in the future.
My job as a futurist is to help turn people around and give them some idea of what the future holds.
So, what images come to mind when you think about the future?
If you are like most people, you have some persistent vision of the future that keeps replaying in your head. Perhaps it’s an image of riding on a hoverboard, traveling in a flying car, or stopping at a space hotel.
Many of these visions have been planted in your head through the movies you watch or the magazines and books that you read.
More importantly than how they were created is the question, “Who owns these visions?”
I’m not talking about the intellectual property rights associated with these images. Rather, who is it that cares enough about these particular visions to want to take an ownership stake in their creation and fruition?
In the vast majority of all cases, the answer is simply, “no one.”
In the years ahead, the speed of business will continue to accelerate, and executive teams will quickly learn that simply planning for the future is no longer good enough. In order for them to better control their own destiny, they will need to take an ownership stake in the creation of the future, and that’s why this book is so important.
Until now, the science of the future has been a murky science. The tools are primitive, reputations are often suspect, and the unknowns continue to dominate the path ahead.
Scenario planning, trend analysis, demographic shifts, and cyclical patterns are all tiny Braille bumps on the looming mosaic that constitutes our future, and some of our best and brightest continue to be confounded when it comes to predicting the future.
But what if we step beyond simply predicting the future and instead work on controlling it?
Contact:
If you’d like to get more information about the process for “Communicating with the Future” or to have Futurist Thomas Frey speak at one of your events, please contact Deb at deb (at) davinciinstitute.com or 303-666-4133
.

YouTube Preview Image

Futurist Thomas Frey at the TEDx University of Chicago event

We are a very backward looking society.

We’re very backward looking in that we’ve all personally experienced the past.  As we look around, we see evidence of the past all around us.   The past is very knowable, yet we will spend the rest of our lives in the future.

My job as a futurist is to help turn people around and give them some idea of what the future holds.

Read the rest of this entry »