Most young people today are asking the very simple question, “Why should I buy a home?”

In the past answers were always framed around phrases like “rapid appreciation,” “good tax write-off,” “long-term investment,” and “building equity.”

Today, real estate sales agents are quick to use different phrases like “pride of ownership,” “stable home for your family,” and “you no longer have to deal with a landlord.”

Saving up money for a down payment and closing costs is now a risky investment.

If you do find a home that you love, the real question you should ask yourself is, “Is this a house I will still want to own if the value of the property drops 10% or even 25%?”

For decades, cities have been throwing together cheaply-built housing developments under the guise of affordable housing. But young people are reading this as code words for “future slums,” “high maintenance costs,” and “sucker with a capital S”

The idea of home ownership is on the verge of massive change, and this change will bring with it some unusual new opportunities.

History of Mortgages

The origins of our current mortgage system began in 12th century England where British common law included a clause that would protect a creditor by giving them an interest in the debtor’s property. Even though the creditor held title to the property, if the debt wasn’t paid, the debtor had the right to sell the property to recover their money.

The history of the actual word “mortgage” is very interesting. In the word “mortgage”, the “mort”- is from the Latin word for death and “gage” is from the sense of that word that means a pledge to forfeit something of value if a debt is not repaid. So mortgage is literally a dead pledge. It was dead for two reasons, the property was forfeited or “dead” to the borrower if the loan wasn’t repaid, and the pledge itself was dead if the loan was repaid.

However, it wasn’t until 1934 that modern mortgages came into being. The Federal Housing Administration (FHA) played a critical role. In order to help pull the country out of the Great Depression, the FHA initiated a new type of mortgage aimed at the folks who couldn’t get mortgages under the existing programs. At that time, only four in 10 households owned homes. Mortgage loan terms were limited to 50 percent of the property’s market value, and the repayment schedule was spread over three to five years and ended with a balloon payment. An 80 percent loan at that time meant your down payment was 80 percent — not the amount you financed! With loan terms like that, it’s no wonder that most Americans were renters.

FHA started a program that lowered the down payment requirements. They set up programs that offered 80 percent loan-to-value (LTV), 90 percent LTV, and higher. This forced commercial banks and lenders to do the same, creating many more opportunities for average Americans to own homes.

The FHA also started the trend of qualifying people for loans based on their actual ability to pay back the loan, rather than the traditional way of simply “knowing someone.” The FHA lengthened the loan terms. Rather than the traditional five- to seven-year loans, the FHA offered 15-year loans and eventually stretched that out to the 30-year loans we have today.

Current Housing Issues

When it comes to housing, cities now have plenty of inventory, but it’s all the wrong inventory.

  • Baby boomers don’t like houses with steps, so there will be very little demand for bi-levels, tri-levels, and quad-levels.
  • Within a decade, over 50% of all workers will have the option of working from home. Houses with a home office, where work environments and living environments are well-meshed, require an entirely new set of design requirements.
  • Gen Y as a whole has little tolerance for home maintenance and repair. They may currently be renting a place in a “good enough” neighborhood, but they will not put money down and invest in that same fixer-upper community.
  • Houses in the suburbs are designed around easy access to the garage, with the social needs of the occupants a distant afterthought. People today have a driving need to be more socially active than their isolationist-era neighborhoods allow.
  • Until now, houses have served as warehouses for everything we own, and we all own too much stuff. Rather than a half-functional “stuff museum,” future homes will be designed around functional spaces to maximize our social and digital experiences.

Fluid Populations

We live in a very fluid society. Many of the regulatory impediments that governments have put into place to help stabilize communities are now working against them.

In a fluid society, companies and people tend to migrate towards communities that inspire them. As soon as the economy dropped, Detroit, Florida, and Nevada saw their populations decline almost immediately.

In the future, the most attractive communities will be designed around ways to stimulate new ideas using such things as creative environments, imagination sparkers, and inspirational architecture.

They will also be designed around new ways for people to meet people. Future communities will be judged by their vibrancy, their interconnectedness, and their fluid structures for causing positive human collisions.

The flow and ease with which people move and exchange ideas both inside and outside a community will determine the overall appeal of the community.

Primed for Something Different

As a culture, our relationship with our homes is undergoing a fundamental shift. Depressed housing prices combined with excess inventory and a desire to live “fluidly” are all factors contributing to what I believe will be a new kind of home ownership.

Gone are the days where our homes are considered an investment. Once that perspective was removed from the table, we begin to think about houses and real estate in a whole new light. And the financial commitments we are willing to make began to change.

Beyond financial obligations is an emotional commitment, and that too is changing. In the future, the emotional commitment we are willing to make to a property will be as transitory as our desire to shift jobs and communities.

Here is a new way to think about classes of home ownership:

  • Long Term Ownership: There will always be a group of people who will want to own homes and make a long term commitment to the land, building, and community. But this will be a shrinking percentage of society.
  • Yearly Ownership: A growing number of people will want the stability and benefits of home ownership but only for something approximating a year at a time.
  • Monthly Ownership: Living a transient lifestyle has its benefits and appeal, particularly to younger people who do project-based work in multiple cities. For the monthly ownership group, apartment living has too many rules and is too restrictive.
  • Weekly Ownership: When it comes to week-at-a-time thinking, hotels are far too expensive, but their lifestyle demands that they move often. Their nomadic existence will be driven by employers and work-related demands, but it is the lifestyle they are attracted to.
  • Flexible Ownership: Move whenever it becomes necessary or desirable.

The reason why these will be considered a form of “owning” as opposed to renting has to do with a person’s willingness to buy into a lifestyle.

As an example, if a person who currently owns a home decided to contribute their house to a pool of homes, the company managing the operation would handle all of the maintenance and upkeep, but the residents would transition in and out on a regular basis. Similar to the way people “buy” condos in a resort and then rent them out whenever they are not in use, “house pooling” might become the hot new form of home ownership for temporary workforces.

Similarly, with cheap housing in many cities, larger corporations could buy up large numbers of houses and create their own worker pool housing to meet the needs of the business. Employees will be far easier to attract if an employer can provide housing as a benefit.

Other forms of home ownership may include:

  • Transportable mortgages
  • Transferable mortgages
  • Time-share mortgages
  • Location-share mortgages
  • Lease with an option to buy

Digital Living

One of the primary contributors to our willingness to move often will be our emerging “low stuff” digital lifestyles for today’s young people. To this group, all of life’s essentials have been digitized and are easily transported from city to city.

Things like furniture, draperies, lawnmowers, and appliances will soon be systematized to the point where they are available when needed and styled according to an acceptable level, but will not move when the resident moves.

Flexing along with our relationship to our home will be flexible schooling and daycare for children, flexible healthcare and social activities, and increasingly shallow loyalties to any particular community.

Final Thoughts…

We live in an increasingly mobile society. Information speeds between people at the speed of light and our transportation systems are allowing us to move efficiently from place to place.

As soon as houses stopped being a “good investment,” our cultural thinking shifted from “this is my city, I’ll have to make it work” to “I’ll move wherever I need to.”

Our financial systems still haven’t come to grips with the fact that it still takes six months to sell a home, but only one day to walk away from it.

Current real estate systems are being regulated out of existence.

The market is perfectly poised for a new form of a new form of home ownership and a new style of living. All that remains if for someone to figure out what it will be.

By Futurist Thomas Frey

Author of “Communicating with the Future” – the book that changes everything


5 Responses to “Next Generation Home Ownership”

Comments List

  1. <a href='http://et3.net' rel='external nofollow' class='url'>Graham Kaye-Eddie</a>

    Greetings Thomas Frey This is a most perceptive article. My desire to communicate ET3 has passed you by for some reason that I cannot understand. For example DIGITAL LIVING "To this group, all of life’s essentials have been digitized and are easily transported from city to city". This cannot be achieved without ET3. In facing reality we must have a new transportation system to both enhance and enable the mobility of people and goods from place to place. "We live in an increasingly mobile society". This is correct but how are we going to get around to support your thesis of flexibility? The existing status quo of housing and transportation contributes to 37% of our gas emissions into the natural environment. You must agree that we need to bring a balance to bear with our natural resources and city building. After reading this short note we implore you to first investigate and then join ET3 as a licensee to move this future forward. Graham Kaye-Eddie
  2. <a href='http://www.BennyMoo.com' rel='external nofollow' class='url'>Benjamin Day</a>

    I agree with some of these points, but others are radically off base. Polling data of those who are actually purchasing, as opposed to those that are not purchasing which seems to be your main target, indicates that those who are purchasing are doing so with a much longer term of ownership in mind. The average first-time buyer in 2010 (obviously a skewed year due to the FTB tax credit) was all of 30 years old. That person undoubtedly had lived a transitory life, likely on their 2nd to 5th unique career a mere 6 to 8 years out of college. But when asked how long they thought they would live in their house, their answer flies in the face of the argument that is lack of loyalty to place and community: their answer was 10 years. A 30 year old thinking that they would stay put, in one house, for ten years. The average move-up buyer was 49 and they thought they'd stay in place for 15 years. Now what this does say that is in total agreement with you is that the cheap, disposable, no-quality suburban tract homes that are built around dead shopping malls is completely out of fashion. I live and sell real estate in a market that has a dominating view to the west. The joke used to be that it was easy to sell homes backing to roads because it provided a walk out basement and a view, and shoot, any mobile air force office would buy that so they're three years here would have a great view. Well good luck now. The tipping point year for this change was somewhere around 2004 and 2005, still during the boom, but right when Google Maps started to make a serious foothold in consumer consciousness. At that point, the zero value-adjustment for backing to a busy road due to the compensating trade off of bigger yard, bigger view and likely walk out basement, disappeared, and now it's a $15K to $25K deduction. I think there is a serious delineation forming now between a community class and a mobile class, and that it is not strictly as economic as a renting class and a ownership class. But many of your points here are big, thoughtful, and certainly stir an interesting debate.
    • admin

      Benjamin, Thanks for your comments and feedback. I'm sure if you polled a group other than home buyers you'd get a radically different perspective. But you bring up some good points. Certainly we cannot group everyone into a single group. Each person's interests and motivations are different. Whenever there is a shift, it tends to be a higher percentage of people moving from one group to the next. So there will always be young people buying houses and there will always be renters, but over time the proportions will change. Thanks for your input, Tom
  3. Neville Berkowitz

    There are parts of the world still enjoying booming home prices such as parts of Australia, China and India. It still remains a function of supply and demand and has at its basis job/income security and assured income projections over a foreseeable time frame. Inherently people want their children to grow up in a nice and safe neighborhood and if that means buying a home and committing to a 30 year mortgage then the price is perceived to be worth it. The transient life style of "army brats" moving from base to base and not knowing a home for long has not, generally speaking,produced a type of person that makes for stable parenthood. Whilst home ownership rates in the US are down to their lowest level since 1960 at some 60% I think that those people who want a more stable environment to develop their growing families in will, in time, still choose a permanent home in a "nice" area, if that is affordable for them.The 20-30 year old and perhaps the over 60 year old may increasingly choose to rent in a secure longer term leased environment, one for flexibility and one for releasing of their capital to finance their retirement. The point I am making, as a global real estate economist with over 35 years of experience, is that there are so many sub markets and sub-sub markets that the generality of statements about housing ownership can be akin to ones body- having a sore arm is not reflective of the health of the rest of the body. I also join you in foreseeing the increased flexibility required by certain stratas of potential home buyers and with the massive oversupply of homes for sale in certain areas it will take a long time before home ownership enjoys its reputation as a long term capital investment haven that has been its handle for decades past.However in areas of strong demand and limited supply home ownership will retain its "haven" status. Finding those areas locally and globally is the real quest.
    • admin

      Neville, Thanks for your comments. The work of a futurist is to spot weak signals and research possible long-term implications. Here are some of the signals I've been watching: - 64 million apartments and houses are now vacant in China - http://www.businessinsider.com/there-are-now-enough-vacant-properties-in-china-to-house-over-half-of-america-2010-9 - 1 in 4 U.S. Counties Are Dying - http://www.impactlab.net/2011/02/22/1-in-4-u-s-counties-are-dying/ - 21st Century Ghost Towns in America - http://www.impactlab.net/2011/04/11/21st-century-ghost-towns-in-america/ - Jobs of the Future Will Not Support Basic Standard of Living in U.S. - http://www.impactlab.net/2011/04/02/jobs-of-the-future-will-not-support-basic-standard-of-living-in-u-s/ - 18% of Homes in Florida Are Vacant - http://www.impactlab.net/2011/03/21/18-of-homes-in-florida-are-vacant/ - 1 in 7 Homes in Nevada Sit Empty - http://www.impactlab.net/2011/03/20/1-in-7-homes-in-nevada-sit-empty/ - Owning a Home in the U.S. Loses It’s Luster - http://www.impactlab.net/2011/02/20/owning-a-home-in-the-u-s-loses-its-luster/ - Home Ownership’s Changing Financial Role - http://www.impactlab.net/2011/02/01/home-ownerships-changing-financial-role/ - 20 Million People Live Underground in China - http://www.impactlab.net/2011/01/31/20-million-people-live-underground-in-china/ - Generation Y Doesn’t Want the McMansion - http://www.impactlab.net/2011/01/15/generation-y-doesnt-want-the-mcmansion/ What am I missing? Granted, there will always be regional markets where real estate remains strong. But more so than a visible shift in real estate is a shift in attitudes. With record foreclosures and credit ratings at an all time low, I'm seeing a strong undercurrent of distrust mounting, and the shift in attitudes goes far deeper than a momentary hiccup in the marketplace. Many will still try to hang on to things that worked in the past. But someone will figure out a new approach and the timing is ripe for that to take place. Tom

Leave a Reply