Store-Owner-465Sales tax is a a system that is now on the verge of collapse

As a general rule, extreme levels of complexity take a significant toll on society. The price we pay for complexity is far greater than the money involved. With upwards of 90,000 separate taxing districts in the U.S. sales tax has become an overly complicated system deeply entrenched in the fabric of society, but woefully out of touch with the times.

As people become increasingly mobile, both on the seller and buyer side of every transaction, location-based differentiators become decreasingly relevant.

But when it comes to sales tax, here’s what everyone get’s wrong. Sales tax is not a location tax, it is a transaction tax. The transaction triggers the tax. The location just determines the amount and who the recipients will be. Without a transaction, there is no tax.

The fact that every community wants to add their own extra piece to the sales tax puzzle, requiring special forms and special rules for compliance, is what has turned it into an impossibly complicated system.

Cities and communities across the country are now in dire straits. Their programs and services were framed around the income streams of more prosperous times. Bad systems, like sales tax, get remarkably worse during a bad economy. But they also create an opportunity.

For this reason, I would like to propose a way out.

A little Background

Most cities in the U.S. are funded through some form of sales tax, a system designed during an entirely different era, a system that is now on the verge of collapse.

Sale tax is paid by the buyer and collected by the seller. But many different regulations have been developed around which transactions are taxable and which ones are not.

At the heart of current debates is a 1992 landmark ruling by the Supreme Court that determined retailers are not required to collect sales tax from shoppers unless they have a physical presence in the state where customers live. Initially, this ruling applied mainly to catalog companies and home-shopping channels on TV. But it also applied to the emerging online retail industry, giving them a distinct competitive advantage, and consumers a reason to change their buying habits.

Local retailers who have invested in their community, who send their kids to local schools and volunteer for local charities, quickly found themselves competing with faceless online companies, most of whom have never set foot in town. The problem with current sales tax laws are that they create a disadvantage to those who are local. But here is where it gets complicated.

If an online business has a physical presence in a state, such as a store, office or warehouse, they must collect sales tax from the customers who purchase items in that state. Without a physical presence, no sales tax needs to be collected. That sounds simple enough, until you get into the definition of what constitutes a physical presence.

Some states now claim that anyone doing affiliate sales, placing referral ads on their blog sites and receiving a commission, can be construed as being a local sales agent, and therefore the entire transaction is subject to sales tax. As a result, companies like Amazon and Overstock who count heavily upon the no-sales-tax advantage have cancelled affiliate relationships with anyone doing affiliate sales for them in those states.

Sales tax would be distributed evenly between the region of the buyer and the region of the seller

Proposing a Solution

First, let’s start with the assumption that sales tax must be applied to all retail transactions – period, no exceptions. If we eliminate this one variable, then much of the complex decision-making process currently imposed on retailers is eliminated.

Second, with money becoming increasingly digital, the actual collection and distribution of sales tax will need to move up the food chain to the clearinghouse level. I will explain this idea further in the next section.

Rather than having millions of individual retailers bearing the responsibility for distributing the money, some new entity working in close proximity to our existing clearinghouses will handle the intricacies of making sure all funds are properly sent to the right districts.

Third, if we agree to split the amount of sales tax evenly between the location of the buyer and the location of the seller, there will no longer be any disagreement over collection and distribution of tax receipts.

The whole intent of this approach is to build a sales tax collection mechanism that is both seamless and nearly invisible to both retailers and customers alike.

In its present form, sales tax is far too messy for small-time retailers like those who set up shop at a flea market, craft show, or drive a mobile ice cream cart. Consequently, most of these tax dollars are lost.

It is also far too messy for mid-level participants like wholesalers, affiliate marketers, and subcontractors who shouldn’t even be in the mix.

The key to making this all work will be the use of split payment technology, and a new set of standards for the retail industry.

Split Payment Systems

In mid-2006 I published an online article on the concept of what I termed “fractal transactions.” This concept was later republished in the Jan 2007 issue of The Futurist Magazine.

Simply stated, a fractal transaction, now commonly referred to as a split payment system, is an automated point of money distribution. Money flows into the transaction, from one or more sources, and instantly leaves the transaction, automatically distributing money to one or more recipients. While this doesn’t sound like anything earthshaking, it indeed is.

Efforts in this area were underway long before my article, but the number of companies who have announced split payment systems since then has grown dramatically, including some big-name players like Amazon and PayPal.

If, for example, all retailers were required to have a split payment system built into their point of purchase transaction machines, and once a payment was made the sales tax was automatically sent to each of the tax recipients, while at the same time the purchase price was deposited into the account of the merchant, the overall complexity of the sale process would drop significantly.

As a result, new tax-collecting retailers will spring up all across the country and sales tax receipts would jump to a whole new level.

People rarely object to paying or collecting sales tax. But when the entire process places a mental burden of brain-draining time-sucking compliance, filling out of forms, along with the chance of getting audited, it’s no wonder why so few people want to subject themselves to it.

A well-designed split payment system could eliminate all that and more.

Swipe It Reader

Portable Transaction Machines

Rental car companies, overnight delivery services, and door-to-door delivery services have been experimenting with portable payment devices for years.

But recently a new breed of transaction devices have come out of the woodwork. Some, like The Square, Macally’s new Swipe It Reader, and Japan’s Mophie are designed to turn the iPhone into a payment device. Others, like the Verifone Vx670 or the Cardsave 7780 are standalone portable credit card machines. Some even have built-in check readers.

Even though the technology can work with all forms of digital money, there are still only clunky systems for working with cash transactions. Figuring out how to also work with cash transactions will be both a challenge and an opportunity.

Portable transaction machines are becoming very accessible to retailers. This kind of technology added to the front end will eliminate the need for countless bookkeeping hours on the back end, and the overall level of complexity will drop dramatically.

Here is where it gets interesting

If sales tax were collected and distributed at the clearing house level, payments could be made to tax recipients without any of the merchants having to fill out forms or compliance documents.

To establish the location for buyers and sellers, point of purchase transaction machines will come equipped with a geo-location chip to determine the point of sale, and the zip code of the buyer or shipping address will automatically determine the other side of the equation.

Let’s assume a box of nails was tagged with 10% sales tax, the tax money would be evenly split so 5% went to the location of the seller and 5% went to the location of the buyer. The 5% on the seller side of the equation would be split further with some money going to the state, some to the county, some to the city, and a small amount going to two different special taxing districts. Similarly, the 5% on the buyer side of the equation would also be split with some money going to the state, some to the county, some to the city, and a small amount going to a local transportation tax.

Once the system is functioning well within the U.S., since more and more transactions are happening across international boundaries, it would be interesting to allow foreign countries to join in the system.

This could easily become the beginning of the first global tax system.

Above the Line, Below the Line

Traditionally, merchants have been forced to absorb all of the transaction fees, a sizable piece of the purchase price. In many cities transaction fees end up being higher than sales tax. Since these fees are hidden deep within the bowels of the transaction, few people know the full extent of the damage. But just because they’re not obvious doesn’t mean you are not paying them.

If transaction fees were listed separately and added to the purchase price with a separate line charge, similar to the sales tax, people would quickly become aware of the steep charges being assessed.

As an example, our $10 box of nails would be assessed 10% sales tax and another 5.5% in transaction fees resulting in an $11.55 final purchase price.

If it’s okay to force gas stations to publicly display their gas prices, it should be okay to force credit card processing companies to publicly display their transaction fees.

The only reason this is being proposed is because the number of entities involved in credit card processing, authentication, currency conversion, and gateways has grown dramatically over the years. And the amount of these fees can range significantly, with some risky transactions taking over 10% of the purchase price just for processing the credit card.

Collapsing the Time-Float

Many companies have engineered lengthy late-payment cycles to allow them to squeeze out every possible extra penny from a transaction. One of the most notorious companies playing this game is Wal-Mart, delaying payment to vendors after a sale has been complete by as much as 90-180 days.

They rationalize the time float with product return cycles as buyers can return their purchase for a full refund several months after a purchase. But whatever the rationalization, the time-float between product sale and money flowing into vendor accounts can put the vendors at a serious disadvantage.

With digital money today flowing at the speed of light, efficient payment cycles between retailers, suppliers, vendors, and tax recipients will reduce the cost of doing business.

As a country, we are competing in a global marketplace. Our ability to streamline the efficiency of our systems will weigh heavily in the future on our standing among other countries who can work faster and cheaper than we can.

As a side benefit of reinventing sales tax, we may also have the ability to collapse many of the self-serving time floats throughout the financial world with split payment technologies.

When systems change, it’s important to leverage the situation by taking a macro view of support systems to maximize the scale of opportunity.

Some Final Thoughts

My intent here is to stimulate discussion, not to claim all of the answers.

The accounting and bookkeeping industry thrives in the face of complexity. Each new decision point added to the tax code has been very good for the accounting business, but generally bad for the rest of the economy.

Complexity places an insidious brain-power burden on people, and this translates into a significant toll on society. While it may be unrealistic to eliminate complexity by imposing simplicity, we can at least automate it.

Our future is being shaped by our systems. We now have a golden opportunity to do something amazing, and it all begins with reinventing sales tax.

11 Responses to “Reinventing Sales Tax”

Comments List

  1. Mimi K

    Well, Don, if the global taxes went to building bombs, your comment might have merit. But sales taxes go to provide basic human services so that we can live and thrive, not so that we can kill each other. If we add to Tom's proposed system a caveat of purpose, that a percentage of sales transactions are directed toward collective human well-being, then we have something salutary and marvelous: a global commonwealth for global commonwealth.
  2. Don

    Clarification Part A: Do I understand you to say that you actually think a global sales tax, once collected by some global authority, would somehow go to provide basic human services (so we can live and thrive)? Clarification Part B: If affirmative, where can I get one of those medical [fill in the blank] cards, too?
  3. John

    No doubt collecting sales tax is mind numbing and expensive. What about alternative taxing schemes that don't have to worry about the locations of the parties to the transaction. Value added taxes do a nice job of moving the tax compliance to the manufacturer, wholesaler and distributor (excluding retail VAT). Use taxes on infrastructure and services can also eliminate the sales tax. And finally certain services could be covered by income taxes. Just because the technology allows for improving sales tax collection doesn't mean we should keep the model.
  4. <a href='' rel='external nofollow' class='url'>Kevin Cullis</a>

    Tom, Your suggestion results in everyone going digital and doing away with cash. Not going to happen, at least anytime very soon. Maybe later. If this would do away with the income tax, something like the, then I'd be more for it. Not too many people want globalism. Besides, all politics and taxes are local.
    • admin

      Kevin, Thanks for your input. I think there may be a way of incorporating cash transactions into this as well. My sense is that the sales tax system will be around far longer than the income tax system which I believe is on the verge of imploding. - My goal was to look at this issue from a totally different vantage point and hopefully generate some legitimate discussions. Tom
  5. <a href='' rel='external nofollow' class='url'>David A. Thomas</a>

    This is a really good example of how it frequently takes extra work and expense to make a system simpler for an end-user.
  6. <a href='' rel='external nofollow' class='url'>Michael Cushman</a>

    Hi Tom Good stuff. Better processing of anything is a good idea. A clearing house approach is very reasonable and a well established solution in this world... used in telecommunications, banking, medical... I knew the phrasing you used of a global taxing scheme would cause a knee-jerk reaction from the all-taxes-are-evil crowd. Like life without local police, fire protection, road maintenance and cleaning, signage, snow removal, courts, prisons, water safety, emergency medical technicians, hospitals, water delivery, sewage, parks, building inspections, etc. would be heaven. NOT. On the international front, you didn't mention it, but there could be automatic refunding of VAT taxes to Americans shopping in Europe. Wouldn't that be sweet! Anyway, I think your idea removes a lot of friction from the system as well as conflicts over jurisdictions, and as you say, why not use the same system for settling splitting to vendors as well. (This can be done in banking now through CC processing, and it's starting to catch on.
  7. <a href='' rel='external nofollow' class='url'>Ray Hutchins</a>

    Another thoughtful piece Tom. Thanks. I will push this to accounting professionals I know. Without their support, it goes no where.
  8. <a href='' rel='external nofollow' class='url'>Vince Emmer</a>

    Inefficient as sales taxes are, compared with other forms of taxation, political jurisdictions are attracted to sales taxes because they are easy to collect relative to other taxes. Another advantage of sales taxes to governments is that they cause less heartburn with taxpayers because they "nickel and dime" revenue out of taxpayers in small, seemingly innocuous sums. In contrast, taxpayers receive large invoices for thousands of dollars for property taxes. It is these big bills that light the fire under taxpayers revolts. A VAT or a national sales tax can close the internet/catalogue vendor loopholes, but then local jurisdiction lose a degree of control over their tax revenues. State and local governments become more dependent on transfers (block grants, education funding, etc...) from higher levels of government and that exposes them to the vagaries higher, more powerful governments. Local jurisdictions lose power - which some people will think is a good thing, some not. As Don and Mimi above illustrate, the entirely legitimate debate over the acceptable uses of tax money probably will have to be narrowed before broad acceptance for more efficient tax collection systems can be garnered.
  9. <a href='' rel='external nofollow' class='url'>Gary R. Anderson</a>

    You said... "The whole intent of this approach is to build a sales tax collection mechanism that is both seamless and nearly invisible to both retailers and customers alike." OH NO, if we finally rid ourselves of the 20-25% hidden tax in products, and the withholding tax(es) that come out of my pay, and the taxes on education, investment, gifting my money or even being taxed AFTER I die, -- I want a tax that I can plainly SEE, every time I open my wallet, so I can shake my fist at that phalic dome in DC, and promise retribution. The reason we have this problem is people have no idea how much in tax they are paying, because they are spared the duty of limiting their government. A split tax just takes the transparency out of the tax, so all I'm left with is some robotic server that took my money. I do however, see benefit in making it a "ONE TAX" split into basis points of tax between buyer & seller locations, if in separate states, and various levels of government, so long as the tax ONLY falls on the FINAL point of consumption, NOT on manufacturers, wholesalers, couriers, etc. Also, the respective states should collect ALL the tax, and send to the feds that which is necessary to maintain the Union of the USA. The closest plan for replacing the income tax with a consumption/sales tax is at:, and expand/improve on it AFTER we behead the IRS. It is HR25 & S13 and has 60+ co-sponsors. It is the ONLY plan that ENDS the IRS.

Leave a Reply